A.P. Lawrence

2004/12/12 nat, masquerade

Network Address Translation. Purists like to reserve this for the specific case of one to one mapping: one internal address to one external address. That usually means that you'll have a block of public addresses, though it doesn't mean that you need a public IP for every internal address. It does mean that you can only have as many active connections as you have public addresses. If you had only two public IP's, only two internal machines could be active at any given time.

If you did have an equal number of public IP's, you'd use static mapping: your internal 192.168.1.2 machine would always use the same public IP, 192.168.1.3 would use another, and so on.

A special case is where you have one public IP and want every internal machine to have access whenever they want. Masquerading answers that problem by multiplexing connections through tracking port numbers. That does mean that there is always a bounded limit to the number of connections that can be made, but the default for Linux is 4,096 and can be increased (though obviously it can't be arbitrarily increased: you couldn't devote ALL ports to masquerading).

A good overview of all this is http://www.suse.de/~mha/linux-ip-nat/diplom/node4.html#SECTION00040000000000000000

Psst - Wanna work for yourself?

Comments
WordsoftheDaynatmasquerade :

"...you couldn't devote ALL ports to masquerading..."

Technically, masquerading should only use the dynamic port range, that is port numbers 49,152 to 65,535, to avoid conflict with registered ports. That amounts to some 16,000 usable ports, more than enough to support most applications.

--BigDumbDinosaur

Hmmm - actually NAT does not require a pure 1-1 mapping between external and external adresses ... see NAPT (a special case for NAT where ports are also taken into account). The main difference between NAT and Masquerade is that NAT is able to use more than one external IP-adress.

(ref. to Comer - TCP/IP Principles, protocols and Architechture vol 1 - pp 394+ ISBN0-13-018380-6).

-- KimPetersen

---December 12, 2004



---December 12, 2004



Add your comments

Why no "Digg this!" etc.?

Enter your email address for automatic notification of new posts here
(be sure to whitelist 'feedburner.com' if you use spam filtering)

My Working for yourself E-Book will show you how to break free
from the 9 to 5 grind.

Have you tried Searching this site?

Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates

This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.

Publishing your articles here